DPI Explained

The dpi written to the image are just a factor to tell the system how large to scale the image when printing it. If they are omitted, most 2D imaging apps simply assume ’72′. To be correct, these are indeed actualy the ppi (pixels per inch). The ppi don’t affect the actual image resolution in pixels. For example, lets say you like to print the image with a 4:3 aspect at 4″×3″ inch size. Your printer is capable of producing 1,440 dpi. The image is 8 bits deep. This means 256 intensity levels per color. This number is slightly decreased by the CMYK conversion (assuming your image was RGB before) but this is negligible. Now you only need to calculate the ppi of the image from the lpi (lines per inch — or the ‘screen frequency’) being printed.

The formula to calculate the number of intensity levels printed is:

levels_printed = (dpi ÷ lpi) ^ 2 + 1

ppi should be calculated as

ppi = lpi × 2.5

Note that lower values will also work, depending on the frequencies in the source image, but 2.5 is said to be a save value.

Since levels_printed is known (should be 256 for 8 bits), as are dpi (1,440), we can reorder the above term like this to find out the value of lpi:

lpi = dpi ÷ √(levels_printed – 1)

in our case 1440 ÷ √(255) ≈ 90; since 90 × 2.5 = 225 your image should have 225 ppi.

4″ × 225 pixels/inch = 900 pixels

3″ × 225 pixels/inch = 675 pixels

Voila; your image needs to be 900×675 pixels in size if you want it to print at 90 lpi on an 1440 dpi printer w/o banding.

This is all that counts. Even if f.e. a TIFF file of the pixel dimensions in our example is set to 72 ppi, arriving being 12.5″ × 9.375″ large in your DTP/imaging program, you could still scale the image to 4″ × 3″ w/o physically touching it, i. e. by plain changing the ppi to 225; and everything will be all right.

For example, in Photoshop, open the ‘Image Size’ dialog, uncheck ‘Resample Image’ and enter the new ppi in the ‘Resolution’ field. You see that the ‘Print Size’ ‘Width’ and ‘Height’ are changed accordingly while the (grayed out) ‘Pixel Size’ ‘Width’ and ‘Height’ stay fixed.

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

The Power of Interdisciplinary Teams

If you face a problem, one way to look for a solution may be to ask people from different fields. A lot of time a solution doesn’t present itself because the knowledge you have in a specific field also acts as a boundary for your imagination.

Before I continue talking about the subject itself, let me start with a story.

Many people have commented on the ‘Liquid’ shelf system my very good friend Sascha Ulber designed, in spring 2003. As trivial as it looks, the way it was conceptualized and most things about it were about five years ahead of the curve then.

Continue »

A Comment on the iPhone 4’s “Retina Display” Debate

Several blogs and mailing lists I frequent linked to an article investigating the validity of Apple’s claims that the iPhone 4′s display has a ‘terminal’ resolution for the application at hand: namely a human reading its display at an ‘average’ distance (which, being unspecified in Apple’s press release, offers quite a bit of latitude for interpretation).

The article ignores several important facts.

Continue »

On Plagiarism & Creativity in the Digital Age

A while ago there was a thread on the 3D-Pro mailing list that diverged from its original subject and took a turn towards a debate about copyright.

The debate resulted when someone discovered that part of an image was being used as a backdrop for another image without giving proper credit.

Continue »